About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of AK governor reveals 'tip of the iceberg' of '2 Dan Sullivans' scandal was noticed months ago from Fox News, published October 30, 2026. The transcript contains 1,920 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"ALL RIGHT, THE ALASKA GOVERNOR MIKE DUNLEVY JOINS US NOW. GOVERNOR, WELCOME TO YOU. A LOT OF EYEBALLS ON ALASKA IN THIS MOMENT. WHAT CAN YOU OFFER TO WHAT WE'VE LEARNED SO FAR ABOUT THIS RACE AND THIS EXTRA CANDIDATE? YEAH, WELL, GREAT. THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY, JOHN SANDERS. SO WE IN THE STATE..."
[0:00] ALL RIGHT, THE ALASKA
[0:01] GOVERNOR MIKE DUNLEVY JOINS US
[0:03] NOW.
[0:03] GOVERNOR, WELCOME TO YOU.
[0:05] A LOT OF EYEBALLS ON ALASKA
[0:06] IN THIS MOMENT.
[0:07] WHAT CAN YOU OFFER TO WHAT WE'VE
[0:09] LEARNED SO FAR ABOUT THIS RACE
[0:11] AND THIS EXTRA CANDIDATE?
[0:12] YEAH, WELL, GREAT.
[0:15] THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY,
[0:16] JOHN SANDERS.
[0:17] SO WE IN THE STATE GOVERNMENT,
[0:20] IN MY OFFICE, BACK IN MAY AND
[0:22] THEN JUNE, REALLY SAW AN ISSUE
[0:23] WITH THIS CANDIDACY OF THIS
[0:25] INDIVIDUAL LOT OF PETERSBURG
[0:26] ALASKA THAT HAS THE SAME NAME
[0:28] AS OUR INCUMBENT DAN SULLIVAN.
[0:29] WE DID OUR OWN PRELIMINARY
[0:31] INVESTIGATION AND THE RESULT OF
[0:33] THAT WAS WE AT THE DIVISION OF
[0:35] ELECTIONS TOOK THE INDIVIDUAL'S
[0:36] NAME OFF THE BALLOT.
[0:37] WAS GOING TO PREVENT HIS NAME
[0:39] FROM BEING ON THE BALLOT BECAUSE
[0:41] THE BELIEF AT THAT TIME WAS THE
[0:43] INTENT.
[0:44] IT WASN'T JUST THE NAME ISSUE.
[0:46] IT WAS THE INTENT OF WHAT HIS
[0:48] GOAL WAS.
[0:49] AND IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN ELECTION
[0:51] INTEGRITY HERE IN THE STATE OF
[0:52] ALASKA, WE FELT THAT WAS THE
[0:53] BEST MOVE.
[0:54] WE WERE OVERRULED BY THE
[0:56] ALASKA SUPREME COURT AT THAT
[0:57] TIME SO HIS NAME ENDED UP GOING
[0:58] ON THE BALLOT.
[0:59] NOW WITH THIS NEW REVELATIONS
[1:01] IN THE NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE,
[1:04] WE'RE MORE THAN COMPELLED TO
[1:06] FOLLOW UP ON THE INVESTIGATION.
[1:08] AND WE ARE STARTING THAT
[1:10] DILIGENTLY HERE TODAY.
[1:11] WE'LL CONTINUE THAT.
[1:13] BUT THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING
[1:15] FOR ALASKA.
[1:16] THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING FOR
[1:17] THIS ELECTION.
[1:18] QUITE FRANKLY, THIS IS NOT A
[1:20] GOOD THING FOR THE DEMOCRAT
[1:21] PARTY.
[1:22] THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING FOR
[1:24] THE DEMOCRATS.
[1:25] THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING FOR
[1:26] THE DEMOCRATS.
[1:27] AND THE FEAR IS THAT THIS IS
[1:29] JUST A PRECURSOR OF SOME OF THE
[1:31] ACTIVITIES THAT WE MAY SEE IN
[1:32] THE FUTURE IN ELECTIONS, NOT
[1:33] JUST HERE IN ALASKA, BUT
[1:34] ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
[1:35] EVEN THE LADIES OF THE VIEW
[1:36] WERE ALL OVER THE PELTOLA
[1:37] CAMPAIGN SAYING THAT THIS WAS A
[1:38] DIRTY TRICK AND SHOULDN'T
[1:39] HAVE HAPPENED.
[1:40] THIS IS A GOOD THING FOR THE
[1:42] DEMOCRATS.
[1:43] I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE
[1:45] PROCEDURE IN COURT TO TRY TO
[1:47] GET DANIEL J. SULLIVAN OFF THE
[1:48] BALLOT.
[1:49] JUNE 8TH, THERE WAS A NOTICE
[1:51] THAT THE STATE WAS INVESTIGATING
[1:52] HIS CANDIDACY.
[1:53] JUNE 10TH, THE VISION LETTER
[1:55] CONCERNING ITS PRELIMINARY
[1:56] DETERMINATION.
[1:57] JUNE 15TH, FINAL DETERMINATION
[1:58] LETTER REMOVING HIM FROM THE
[1:59] BALLOT BEFORE THAT DECISION
[2:01] WAS OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME
[2:02] COURT.
[2:03] IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT OF A
[2:05] HYPOTHETICAL HERE, BUT DO YOU
[2:06] THINK THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE NOW
[2:11] THAT THAT DETERMINATION MIGHT
[2:12] HAVE BEEN QUITE DIFFERENT?
[2:13] IF THEY HAD THIS INFORMATION
[2:14] WE HAVE NOW, I THINK IT WOULD
[2:17] HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT TO BE
[2:18] PERFECTLY HONEST WITH YOU.
[2:19] I MEAN, WE ARE, WE KNEW THERE
[2:21] WAS SOMETHING GOING ON THERE,
[2:22] BUT WE'RE ALSO SOMEWHAT
[2:23] SURPRISED BY THE REVELATIONS.
[2:24] AND WE NOW BELIEVE THAT THAT'S
[2:26] PROBABLY JUST THE TIP OF THE
[2:27] ICEBERG, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU.
[2:28] SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE STARTING OUR
[2:30] OWN INVESTIGATION HERE IN THE
[2:31] STATE OF ALASKA.
[2:32] I KNOW THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS
[2:34] THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS
[2:38] THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS THE
[2:39] UNFORTUNATE THING IS WE HAVE AN
[2:40] ELECTION COMING UP ON US AND
[2:41] WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF VOTING
[2:42] RIGHT NOW.
[2:43] BUT, YOU KNOW, THE OTHER THING I
[2:45] WOULD SAY, JOHN AND SANDRA, IS
[2:47] WE WOULD NOT BE HAVING THIS
[2:48] CONVERSATION AT ALL IF WE DIDN'T
[2:49] HAVE A THING IN PLACE CALLED
[2:51] RATE CHOICE VOTING IN THE STATE
[2:52] OF ALASKA.
[2:53] AND THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT, YOU
[2:55] KNOW, WAS BROUGHT INTO ALASKA
[2:56] A COUPLE YEARS AGO, A LOT OF
[2:57] OUTSIDE MONEY WAS BEHIND IT.
[2:58] BUT WHAT HAPPENS NOW IS WE HAVE
[3:00] FIVE PEOPLE WITH THE SAME LAST
[3:04] NAME IN A JUNGLE PRIMARY AND
[3:06] WHAT IT DOES IS AGAIN IT IMPACTS
[3:08] ELECTION INTEGRITY.
[3:09] I'VE HAD PEOPLE COME TO ME THAT
[3:11] ARE VOTING NOW EARLY SAYING IT
[3:13] WAS VERY CONFUSING.
[3:14] YOU HAVE THE TWO NAMES, THE TWO
[3:16] DAN SULLIVAN NAMES CLOSELY
[3:17] TOGETHER.
[3:18] AS A MATTER OF FACT, WHEN WE DID
[3:20] OUR INVESTIGATION IN LATE SPRING,
[3:22] EARLY SUMMER, THE DAN SULLIVAN
[3:25] FROM PETERSBURG, ALASKA, HIS
[3:27] INITIAL EMAILS TO THE DIVISION
[3:29] OF ELECTION WANTED HIM TO PUT
[3:31] ON THE BALLOT AS DANIEL S.
[3:32] SULLIVAN.
[3:33] HIS MIDDLE INITIAL IS NOT S.
[3:35] THAT'S THE INITIAL OF OUR
[3:37] INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR.
[3:38] YEAH.
[3:39] SO WE KNEW THAT THE INTENT
[3:41] WAS QUESTIONABLE THEN.
[3:43] WE REALLY, REALLY BELIEVE IT IS
[3:45] INCREDIBLY QUESTIONABLE, VERY
[3:46] QUESTIONABLE NOW.
[3:47] WELL, WHERE IS THIS GUY?
[3:49] HAVE YOU TRACKED THIS GUY
[3:52] DOWN?
[3:53] WELL, WE HAVE FOLKS THAT WILL
[3:55] BE AGAIN FOLLOWING UP ON
[3:56] INVESTIGATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS
[3:57] WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL AND
[3:58] OTHERS.
[3:59] INITIALLY HE DID NOT WANT TO
[4:01] TALK WITH THE EARLIER INQUIRIES.
[4:03] HE DIDN'T WANT TO DO IT UNDER
[4:05] OATH WITH AN AFFIDAVIT.
[4:07] SO, AGAIN, ALL THESE THINGS
[4:09] LEAVE YOU TO BELIEVE THIS WAS NOT
[4:10] RUN.
[4:11] HE WAS ASKED TO RESPOND TO
[4:12] THIS UNDER OATH AND REFUSED?
[4:14] YES.
[4:15] WE WANTED HIM TO GIVE, WE WANTED
[4:18] HIM TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, YOU
[4:20] KNOW, THROUGH AN AFFIDAVIT AND
[4:22] HE REFUSED TO DO THAT.
[4:24] HE ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS BUT
[4:26] IT WAS AN UNDER OATH SCENARIO.
[4:30] SO, GOVERNOR, A LOT OF PEOPLE
[4:32] WONDERING, YOU KNOW, IF THIS
[4:34] INVESTIGATION UNCOVERS ANYTHING,
[4:36] WILL THERE BE ANYTHING CRIMINAL
[4:38] THAT DANIEL J. SULLIVAN OR THE
[4:40] PELTOLA CAMPAIGN MIGHT BE
[4:41] LIABLE FOR?
[4:42] I POINT TO A FLORIDA RACE
[4:44] BACK IN 2020.
[4:45] IT WAS A STATE SENATOR'S RACE.
[4:46] THERE WAS A GUY NAMED JOSE
[4:48] RODRIGUEZ WHO WAS THE
[4:49] ENCUMBENT SENATOR.
[4:50] APPARENTLY A REPUBLICAN
[4:52] OPERATIVE RECRUITED SOMEBODY AND
[4:54] ACCORDING TO COURT DOCUMENTS
[4:56] PAID $45,000 FOR THIS PERSON TO
[4:58] ENTER THE RACE TO TRY TO MUDDY
[5:00] UP THE WATERS.
[5:01] BOTH OF THEM APPARENTLY WERE
[5:03] CONVICTED OF CAMPAIGN VIOLATIONS,
[5:05] VOTER FRAUD.
[5:06] DO YOU THINK THERE COULD BE
[5:08] POTENTIALLY ANY CRIMINALITY
[5:09] HERE?
[5:10] I MEAN, WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT
[5:12] DANIEL J. SULLIVAN?
[5:13] WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT HIS
[5:14] CAMPAIGN?
[5:15] WHO IS FUNDING IT?
[5:16] IS HE BEING PAID ANY MONEY BY
[5:18] ANYBODY?
[5:19] DO WE KNOW ANY OF THAT?
[5:22] THAT'S WHERE THE
[5:24] INVESTIGATION I THINK IS
[5:25] INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT.
[5:26] WE HAVE TO ANSWER THOSE
[5:27] QUESTIONS.
[5:28] WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE
[5:30] INVESTIGATION IS DONE ACCORDING
[5:31] TO LAW WITH INTEGRITY WHICH WE
[5:33] WILL DO.
[5:34] AGAIN, WE SAW THE TIP OF THE
[5:36] ICEBERG BACK IN MAY AND JUNE
[5:38] AND NOW WE'RE SEEING MORE OF THE
[5:40] INVESTIGATION.
[5:41] WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE SURPRISED
[5:43] WHERE THIS WILL LEAD US BUT
[5:45] AN INVESTIGATION HAS TO HAPPEN.
[5:47] AND QUITE FRANKLY, THE
[5:50] INDIVIDUAL SHOULD NOT BE ON THE
[5:51] BALLOT.
[5:52] THEY SIMPLY SHOULD NOT BE ON THE
[5:53] BALLOT.
[5:54] AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT RIGHT
[5:55] NOW HE IS.
[5:56] WE'RE HOPING THAT THIS
[5:58] INVESTIGATION LEADS TO ANSWERING
[5:59] A WHOLE BUNCH OF QUESTIONS AND
[6:01] THEN WE'LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS
[6:02] AFTER THAT AND WHAT THE IMPACT
[6:04] WAS ON THIS PARTICULAR
[6:05] ELECTION.
[6:06] BUT QUITE FRANKLY, THIS IS A SAD
[6:09] DAY, SAD MOMENT, SAD TIME FOR
[6:11] ALASKA.
[6:12] BUT AGAIN, IT'S A WARNING TO THE
[6:14] REST OF THE COUNTRY.
[6:15] WE'VE GOT TO BE VERY CAREFUL
[6:17] GOING INTO THE FUTURE,
[6:18] ESPECIALLY WITH A.I.
[6:19] AND OTHER TYPES OF TRICKS THAT
[6:22] COULD OCCUR WITH AN ELECTION.
[6:23] YEAH, FAIR ENOUGH.
[6:24] GOVERNOR, PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID
[6:26] EARLIER HE BELIEVES THAT PELTOLA
[6:28] SHOULD BE PROSECUTED
[6:29] CRIMINALLY THAT SHE SHOULD
[6:31] RESIGN FROM THE RACE.
[6:32] DO YOU TOO BELIEVE THIS IS
[6:33] DISQUALIFYING?
[6:34] ARE YOU CALLING ON HER TO
[6:35] RESIGN?
[6:36] WELL, THIS IS HUGELY
[6:38] PROBLEMATIC FOR THE CANDIDATE.
[6:39] AND AGAIN, OUR INVESTIGATION, IF
[6:41] IT LEADS TO CRIMINAL CHARGES,
[6:44] WE DON'T CARE WHO THAT IS.
[6:47] WE DON'T CARE IF IT'S A
[6:48] CANDIDATE.
[6:49] WE DON'T CARE WHOSE NAME IT IS.
[6:51] BECAUSE WHAT'S MORE IMPORTANT
[6:53] IS MAINTAINING ELECTION
[6:54] INTEGRITY FOR THE PEOPLE OF
[6:55] ALASKA.
[6:56] IF IT LEADS TO THAT INDIVIDUAL,
[6:59] THE CANDIDATE, THEN SO BE IT.
[7:01] WE'RE GOING TO FOLLOW THE
[7:03] ACTUAL INVESTIGATION, FOLLOW THE
[7:05] LAW, AND WE WILL BE REPORTING
[7:07] OUT ONCE WE'VE CONCLUDED THAT
[7:09] INVESTIGATION AS TO WHERE IT
[7:10] LED.
[7:11] I HAD A CAMPAIGN EVENT
[7:12] LAST NIGHT.
[7:13] MARY PELTOLA BASICALLY SAID,
[7:14] HEY, THIS IS NO BIG DEAL.
[7:15] LISTEN TO WHAT SHE SAID HERE.
[7:18] THIS IS JUST ANOTHER
[7:20] DISTRACTION.
[7:21] IT'S ANOTHER DIVERSION.
[7:22] EVERY DAY IT'S SOME NEW, YOU
[7:24] KNOW, LOOK OVER HERE MOMENT.
[7:26] THIS IS ALL STUFF TO SELL
[7:28] NEWSPAPERS.
[7:29] THIS IS ALL STUFF TO GET
[7:31] SUBSCRIPTIONS.
[7:32] NOBODY AT THE NEW YORK TIMES
[7:34] CARES ABOUT AFFORDABILITY IN
[7:35] ALASKA.
[7:36] WELL, FIRST OF ALL, I
[7:38] THOUGHT IT WAS A LITTLE
[7:39] UNUSUAL THAT A DEMOCRATIC
[7:40] CANDIDATE WOULD BE DISSING THE
[7:41] NEW YORK TIMES.
[7:42] BUT SECONDLY, WHEN IT COMES TO
[7:44] THIS IDEA OF A DISTRACTION, WHO
[7:46] CAUSED THAT DISTRACTION?
[7:48] NOW, THIS IS PROBLEMATIC,
[7:50] ABSOLUTELY.
[7:51] THIS IS REALLY PROBLEMATIC FOR
[7:53] NOT JUST THIS, THEIR CAMPAIGN,
[7:55] BUT AGAIN, FOR ELECTION
[7:57] INTEGRITY.
[7:58] AND WE GOT TO ROOT THIS OUT.
[8:00] WE GOT TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF
[8:01] THIS.
[8:02] WE'RE GOING TO TRY AND DO THIS AS
[8:03] QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
[8:04] ONCE AGAIN, THOUGH, WE'RE GOING
[8:05] TO FILE THE LAWS, BUT WE GOT TO
[8:06] GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS QUICKLY
[8:07] DISTRACTION.
[8:08] WE'RE GOING TO GET TO THE
[8:09] DISTRACTION.
[8:10] WE'RE GOING TO GET TO THE
[8:11] DISTRACTION.
[8:12] BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT'S, YOU
[8:14] HAVE SOME ACTIONS THAT ARE
[8:15] TAKING PLACE, BUT THERE ALSO
[8:16] MAY BE A COVER-UP.
[8:17] WE'LL FIND OUT THROUGH OUR
[8:18] INVESTIGATION.
[8:19] THIS IS SO UNFORTUNATE THIS
[8:20] HAS HAPPENED IN THE STATE OF
[8:21] ALASKA.
[8:22] SO UNFORTUNATE ON THE TIMING.
[8:23] THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY BACK
[8:24] IN JUNE TO REMOVE THIS
[8:26] INDIVIDUAL FROM THE BALLOT.
[8:28] AND WE'LL SEE WHERE THIS
[8:30] LEADS US.
[8:31] BUT IF IT LEADS TO CIVIL ISSUES,
[8:34] WE'LL PURSUE IT.
[8:37] CAN YOU SHARE WITH US ANY MORE
[8:39] ABOUT THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE
[8:40] ASKED OF THIS, THE DANIEL J.
[8:43] SULLIVAN?
[8:44] ANYTHING YOU CAN OFFER US THERE
[8:45] THAT HE WAS ABLE TO, YOU SAID
[8:47] HE DIDN'T GO UNDER OATH, BUT
[8:48] WHAT DID HE SAY?
[8:51] HE ANSWERED SEVERAL
[8:53] QUESTIONS FOR US TO TRY TO
[8:55] ASCERTAIN INTENT.
[8:56] BASED UPON THE ANSWERS AND BASED
[8:59] UPON THE LACK OF OTHER
[9:00] INFORMATION, AGAIN, WE DECIDED
[9:02] THE DIVISION OF ELECTIONS
[9:03] DECIDED THAT HE SHOULD NOT BE
[9:05] BEYOND THE BALLOT.
[9:06] WE MADE THAT DETERMINATION THAT
[9:08] WE BELIEVE THAT THIS CANDIDACY
[9:10] WAS NOT A GENUINE CANDIDACY,
[9:12] THAT THIS CANDIDACY WAS BEING
[9:14] PUT TOGETHER TO GAME THE RANK
[9:16] CHOICE VOTING SYSTEM THAT, IN
[9:19] MY OPINION, UNFORTUNATELY,
[9:20] CURRENTLY HAVE.
[9:21] AND SO WHEN THAT OCCURRED, WE
[9:24] WERE SUED BY ANOTHER PARTY AND
[9:27] THE SUPREME PORT OF ALASKA THEN
[9:29] DECIDED THAT, NO, THERE MAY BE
[9:31] QUESTIONS BUT THIS INDIVIDUAL IS
[9:32] GOING TO GO ON THE BALLOT.
[9:33] THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TODAY.
[9:35] AND AGAIN, I THINK IF THEY HAD
[9:37] THE INFORMATION THAT IS COMING
[9:38] OUT NOW IN THE NEW YORK TIMES,
[9:40] AND PROBABLY A LOT MORE
[9:42] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT
[9:43] WE'LL PROBABLY FIND OUT THROUGH
[9:44] INVESTIGATIONS AND POSSIBLY
[9:46] EVEN SUBPOENAS AT THE
[9:47] CONGRESSIONAL LEVEL, I THINK
[9:48] THEY WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENT
[9:49] DECISION.
[9:50] GOVERNOR, WE HAVE TO THINK
[9:52] ABOUT WHAT WE HAD VOTES IN
[9:54] UNIVERSITY AND TAKE A DIFFERENT
[9:56] DECISION.
[9:57] GOVERNOR, ONE QUICK
[9:58] QUESTION BEFORE WE LET YOU GO.
[10:00] THE STORY IS OUT THERE NOW,
[10:02] PEOPLE CAN MAKE A DECISION BUT
[10:03] UP UNTIL THIS POINT, 60,000
[10:04] EARLY VOTES HAVE BEEN CAST
[10:05] ALREADY.
[10:06] WHAT'S 23% OF THE NUMBER OF
[10:07] AVERAGE ALASKANS WHO CAST
[10:09] VOTES IN THE LAST MIDTERM
[10:10] ELECTION.
[10:12] THAT'S GOING TO BE PART OF THE
[10:14] FOLLOW-UP, IS TO SEE HOW MANY OF
[10:17] THOSE PEOPLE, WHEN THEY VOTED,
[10:19] THOUGHT THEY WERE VOTING FOR THE
[10:20] INCUMBENT.
[10:21] HOW MANY OF THOSE PEOPLE KNEW
[10:23] EXACTLY WHO THEY WERE VOTING FOR.
[10:25] I MEAN, IT'S A DOG'S BREAKFAST,
[10:27] TO BE HONEST WITH YOU.
[10:28] IT'S A MESS.
[10:29] AND WE'RE GOING TO UNRAVEL IT.
[10:31] AND WE'RE GOING TO HELP THE
[10:32] PEOPLE OF BLASKA UNDERSTAND
[10:34] EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.
[10:35] ALL RIGHT.
[10:35] GOVERNOR, WE APPRECIATE YOU
[10:37] JOINING US HERE.
[10:38] BY THE WAY, I SHOULD NOTE SENATOR
[10:40] THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING US
[10:43] AND WE'LL BE AT THE TOP OF THE
[10:46] HOUR ON THIS STORY.
[10:48] GOVERNOR, AGAIN, THANK YOU VERY
[10:49] MUCH.
[10:49] THANKS VERY MUCH.