Try Free

EXCLUSIVE: Jack Smith WARNS Nicolle about unprecedented attacks on rule of law in FIRST interview

MS NOW July 3, 2026 11m 2,149 words
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of EXCLUSIVE: Jack Smith WARNS Nicolle about unprecedented attacks on rule of law in FIRST interview from MS NOW, published July 3, 2026. The transcript contains 2,149 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today,"

[0:01] I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against [0:07] President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President [0:13] Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based [0:20] on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a [0:26] Republican. No one, no one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that [0:34] he be held to account. So that is what I did. Hi again, everybody. It's now five o'clock here in [0:40] Washington, D.C. This show, Deadline White House, debuted the day that Donald Trump fired Jim Comey. [0:47] He fired him for refusing to look the other way in the Mike Flynn case, among other actions that [0:53] Donald Trump viewed as annoying and disloyal. Since that first broadcast, we have endeavored to [0:58] chronicle Donald Trump's vicious war against the rule of law in our country. And no one understands [1:04] what Trump's attacks against the rule of law look like better than that man, former special counsel [1:10] Jack Smith. So much of what we know about Donald Trump's efforts to undo his defeat in the 2020 [1:16] presidential election against Joe Biden and his mishandling of some of the country's most sensitive [1:21] national security secrets is because of the tireless work of Jack Smith and his team. [1:27] More than anyone else in the country, he represented a threat to Donald Trump because he followed the [1:33] facts and they let him deep inside Donald Trump's government and political coalition. The facts [1:40] revealed crimes and those crimes were serious enough to represent a very real risk of conviction [1:46] at trial for Donald Trump. That's the standard to indict somebody. And because of that fact, [1:53] Donald Trump has called Jack Smith horrible things, a quote, thug, a scoundrel, a criminal and a sick [1:59] man. And we could actually go on and on, but we don't want to waste our time that way. Trump has [2:04] threatened to prosecute him. And Jack Smith has made clear that he was just doing his job. He would do [2:10] it all over again if given the chance. In his letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland delivering his [2:16] final report, he writes this, quote, the claim from Mr. Trump that my decisions as a prosecutor were [2:22] influenced or directed by the Biden administration or other political actors is, in a word, laughable. [2:28] While we were not able to bring the cases we charged to trial, I believe the fact that our team stood [2:33] up for the rule of law matters. I believe the example our team set for others to fight for [2:39] justice without regard for the personal costs matters. The facts as we uncovered them in our [2:45] investigation and as we set forth in my report matter. That's where we start the hour. Joining us [2:51] for his first interview, former special counsel, Jack Smith. Thank you so much for doing this. [2:54] Thank you so much for having me. [2:55] I asked you this when you walked in, and I'll ask you, how weird is it to view it as part of [3:03] your service, to tell the story of the investigations you led? [3:07] Yeah. Well, you know, I was a career prosecutor. I worked in the Justice Department and other [3:11] prosecutors' offices for near on 30 years. And I don't know if your viewers know this, but I work [3:17] in Republican and Democratic administrations over and over. I was the acting U.S. attorney in the first [3:24] Trump administration in Nashville, Tennessee. And that administration pointed me to a position [3:30] running a war crimes tribunal for the State Department. So I have investigated cases focusing [3:36] on the facts and law throughout my career. We did this case the same way, under the same standards. [3:42] And, you know, the thing that's, I think, important for your viewers to know is those standards are not [3:47] meant to change from one administration to the next. And in my experience, until now, they haven't. [3:52] And so, you know, I think we are facing an attack on the rule of law that is different in kind and scope [4:00] to anything I've seen in my lifetime. And one of the reasons I wanted to be with you here today [4:07] in advance of the Fourth of July, celebrating the birth of a country that we all love, is to celebrate [4:13] the public servants who do this work, the people I spent my career working shoulder-to-shoulder with. [4:19] I loved being a prosecutor, and part of it was I loved being around these sort of people. [4:24] And it angers me to see them victimized, to see them demonized for doing their jobs. [4:31] I think it's really important that we stand up for them and let them know that there are a lot of [4:37] people out there who back them and who are with them. And it's not just the people who've been [4:43] targeted and fired for no reason for doing their jobs. It's also the people still in the Justice [4:48] Department today. There are a lot of good career prosecutors who right now are working under [4:54] incredibly difficult circumstances, and they're still trying to do the right thing. And these are [5:00] not self-promoters. These are not people who are going to go out and, you know, crow about their [5:05] achievements. We need to hold them up and celebrate them because they're part of what [5:10] makes this country great. [5:10] Some of the agents, FBI agents that work for you, have been savaged by Donald Trump and [5:19] Kash Patel. At least one agent talked about being fired while he was taking care of his very, [5:27] very sick wife. What did you expect to happen to these agents? And do you regret putting any of [5:35] them in that position? I feel terrible about what has happened to them. If there's one thing I've [5:41] spent my time on since leaving my work as special counsel is doing what I can to help and support [5:47] them. The individual you're talking about, he was nursing his wife who was dying of cancer, [5:55] and they fired him shortly after she died. I went to the funeral. That funeral was filled [6:01] with heroes, public servants on both families. And I just can't believe that if people knew the [6:07] character of these people I worked with, that they could ever stand for the demonizing that's [6:13] happened to them. It's just beyond anything I can understand. [6:16] And my sense from my limited exposure to people in DOJ and the FBI from my time in government is they [6:22] don't really want to go do other things. They want this to be their life's work, protecting the [6:27] country's national security. Will you talk a little bit about the price people have paid who [6:33] have been purged for political purposes? Yeah, I mean, you know, a lot of the agents and prosecutors [6:38] I've worked with, and to be clear, not just in the special counsel's office, but throughout my career [6:43] in a bunch of different positions I've had in the Justice Department, this is the culmination of what [6:47] they wanted to do. It's why they went to law school, and it's their way of serving our country. [6:52] And we've seen so many times in these retribution cases where prosecutors wouldn't be a part of it. [6:58] You know, prosecutors in Minnesota who are like, I'm not going to investigate the family member of [7:02] a shooting victim. I'm not doing that. Prosecutors who wouldn't go through with retribution prosecutions. [7:10] And those people give up a lot. This is their whole career. A lot of them, you know, this isn't a [7:15] lucrative sort of profession for a lawyer in terms of what you could do in private practice. [7:19] They have to support their families. And one thing I have hope about is I think the traditions [7:26] in the department, the people that draw are so strong that we're going to have to rehabilitate [7:31] the department for sure. But there's a lot of people still there, still in place, wanting to do [7:36] the right thing, wanting to follow the facts in the law, not be a part of any retribution campaign. [7:42] And I think for me, one of the things I see as I go around and talk to folks, and I try to travel [7:47] around the country a lot and see different people and talk to different perspectives about [7:51] this, is that those people, it really matters to them if they know they're being supported. [7:59] Part of this campaign is to make people feel like isolated and feel like they don't have [8:03] people backing them up. And so I just think it's really important. I want to express my [8:08] support. I think everybody else should express their support. It's not, it's something with [8:13] meaning and it's also something that matters. [8:15] I mean, Chris Wray was the director of the FBI when the FBI agents that you're talking [8:19] about went to work for you. He said nothing. Why? [8:22] You know, I can't really comment on other people's choices. I would say... [8:26] Would it help? [8:27] Well, I think my perspective on this is that in the moment we're in, which is a pretty dire [8:32] moment, right, what we're facing, that we should be uplifting the people who are doing [8:36] the right thing. And I'll give you an example from my life. I resign as special counsel. [8:42] I know I need to get a lawyer because the president has said he wants to jail me for [8:47] doing my job. And so I retain lawyers, Covington and Berlin. As soon as that becomes public, [8:54] the president and the Justice Department target that law firm. And they do it because they [8:58] don't want me to have counsel. They don't want to have anyone represent me. And what happened [9:04] next was the very day that happened, Nicole, the lawyers at the firm called me up and said, [9:09] Jack, don't worry about it. We're there for you. They did not blink for a second. And as you [9:15] know, that's very different than how some other law firms behaved. I think we should [9:20] focus on things like that and separating a firm like Covington and Berlin from other [9:24] ones that didn't show courage to come forward. [9:26] Well, right. The ones that fought also have batted a thousand in the courts. I think Judge [9:31] Beryl Howell described those executive orders as giving her chills, chilling her to the bone. [9:35] But some of the giant law firms that were so central in our politics in the first Trump [9:40] term didn't just capitulate to Trump. They're now working for Trump's Justice Department, [9:44] firms like Paul Weiss and others. What do you make of the damage they're doing to our [9:49] democracy at a moment you describe as dire? [9:51] Yeah, well, I think one of the problems, I mean, there's several layers, right? One of [9:55] the problems right today, besides the retribution prosecutions, is that the Justice Department [10:02] can't do its job, right? If you go to court, well, if you go to court and the judges don't [10:07] trust you, you can't do the basic things that you need to do to represent the American people [10:12] in court. And we have seen judges across the country say they can't trust prosecutors [10:18] anymore. And that has such a cascading effect on any sort of case. And, you know, I can't [10:25] count how many opinions. But one opinion like that in my career would have been seismic. [10:30] People could not would not know what to do if a court said, you know, trust that's been [10:36] built over generations has been lost in days. Right. And that's happening every day. And so regardless [10:41] of what you think politically, they're just not effective at doing their job anymore. [10:45] They've jettisoned expertise. Right. And so we have a situation where we've got rid of [10:52] people who know how to protect our national security. And we think that that's somehow [10:57] not going to have an effect on our national security. You know, an example I can give you [11:02] Brian Driscoll. I don't know if you know who he is. He was the great video at the beginning [11:07] to kind of rally the troops that seemed from the outside. Yeah. I mean, he's a folk hero [11:12] in the FBI. If you were casting for a hero, that's what they look like. Right. And just [11:19] for your viewers, this is a guy, career agent, you know, mob investigator, SWAT team, hostage [11:25] rescue, served overseas, Medal of Value, bravery medals, all these things, and an expert in [11:32] counterintelligence. They got rid of him because he stood up for agents who were being targeted [11:37] improperly. You can't tell me, you cannot tell me our country is as safe as it was when [11:43] people like that are being let go and fired for no reason.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →